Slate's Timothy Noah Doesn't TRY to Hide Hate for Bush
Topic: Media
What is one to do when one writes for an obvious left-leaning Internet magazine sponsored originally by Microsoft before a recent sale to the Washington Post when there is no new stories that one can write about regarding the problems in New Orleans that have not already been reported a million times on cable news networks? Why, you attack the President (whom you obviously hate yet continually fail to admit it) with something that was published in 18-fucking-32.
Slate's Timothy Noah has written in his Chatterbox column that Bush was aware that the levees in New Orleans would break because of an article that Noah undoubtedly had to pay (or ridicule) some low-ranking intern to Google until they found that was published in, we shit you not,
Domestic Manners of the Americans, by Fanny Trollope (
the FAMOUS Fanny Trollope - ed.). The point of the article was that the levees were not designed to withhold Mother Nature.
This is President Bush's fault, according to Noah, who previously said that
"I don't think anyone anticipated the breach of the levees." So what is the point of our reporting? The point is that we have always thought that, while smart, Noah was a shameless socialist, we are now certain of it, and we are going to continue to read and report on his ridiculous column every week until he or a representative sends us notice to "please stop making fun of our client."
Timothy Noah, this is for you; you are one dumb son of a bitch who only seems to exist to prove that there is no need to have intelligent thoughts as long as you can spit your venom towards the object of your hate, which in your case is anyone who thinks more conservative than you. However, socialists are pretty much the farthest left you can be, so it must suck for you to hate everyone... douchebag.
SLATE
Posted by James
at 10:01 AM CDT